ID: 33
Tributary canyons of the Arafura Depression
Key Ecological Feature
Legal documents
Maps and Images
Profile
Legal description |
The Commonwealth marine area is a matter of national environmental significance under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). As such, actions that have, will have, or are likely to have, a significant impact on it require approval. In February 2014, the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) became the sole designated assessor of petroleum and greenhouse gas activities in Commonwealth waters in accordance with the Minister for the Environment’s endorsement of NOPSEMA’s environmental authorisation process under Part 10, section 146 of the EPBC Act. Under the streamlined arrangements, impacts on the Commonwealth marine area by petroleum and greenhouse gas activities will be assessed solely through NOPSEMA. Key ecological features (KEFs) are not matters of national environmental significance and have no legal status in their own right. However, they may be considered as components of the Commonwealth marine area. This KEF was identified in the North Marine Bioregional Plan. Under section 176 of the EPBC Act, once a bioregional plan has been made the minister responsible for the environment must have regard to it when making any decision under the Act to which the plan is relevant. |
Values |
Almost all canyons in the North Marine Region are located within this key ecological feature and endemic benthic species are believed to occur there (Wilson 2005). Primary productivity in this feature is likely to be associated with movements of water through the canyons and surface water circulation driven by seasonal north-west monsoon winds. Studies have shown that biological diversity and ecosystem processes in the area are influenced by the heterogeneity of canyon habitats. The steep topography of the canyons, their diverse current regimes, nutrient enrichment and entrapment, detritus funnelling and diverse substrate types form widely divergent ecosystems (McClain & Barry 2010; Vetter 1994; Vinogradova 1959) which, in combination with the regional setting and geological origins of the area, strongly influence species biodiversity (Kloser et al. 2010; RJ Kloser, pers. comm., May 2011). A survey conducted in the area has identified at least 245 macroscopic species, including a diverse variety of invertebrates (e.g. sponges, corals, sea anemones, tunicates, worms, crustaceans, brittle stars, feather stars) and six small fish species (Wilson 2005). It is estimated that a further 500 species could be identified from post-survey analysis of grab and dredge samples (Wilson 2005). Marine turtles (most likely olive ridleys) have been reported to feed in the vicinity of the canyons (Whiting et al. 2007). |
National and/or regional importance |
The Tributary canyons of the Arafura Depression are defined as a key ecological feature for their high productivity and high levels of biodiversity and endemism. These values apply to both the benthic and pelagic habitats within the feature. |
Location |
The tributary canyons of the Arafura Depression are located in the Timor Transition provincial bioregion. The canyons are approximately 80–100 m deep and 20 km wide. The largest of the canyons extend some 400 km from Cape Wessel into the Arafura Depression, and are the remnants of a drowned river system that existed during the Pleistocene era (Heap et al. 2004). The spatial boundary of this KEF, as defined in the Conservation Values Atlas, includes all canyons in the Geoscience Australia geomorphic features dataset in the northernmost part of the region between approximately 132° 40' E and 136° 20' E. |
Description |
As a result of the history and geography of the Arafura Sea, sea-floor sediments are calcium carbonate rich with substantial but varying fractions of carbonate sand and sub-fossil shell fragments (Wilson 2005). Sampling in the area has revealed calcareous sand and gravel or sandy mud. The deeper channel sediments are composed of calcareous mud and some areas of rocky substrate (Logan et al. 2006). Although some water flows through the key ecological feature may be associated with the Indonesian Throughflow, the strongest influence on water flows at the sea floor is thought to be tidal ranges that can exceed 5 m vertically (Wilson 2005). Sampling in the area has identified relatively high seafloor currents, particularly across ridges on Pillar Bank and hard grounds. These parts of the feature were also found to support diverse populations of large sessile filter-feeding biota such as sponges, octocorals and comatulacean crinoids (Wilson 2005). Primary productivity in this key ecological feature is believed to be associated with movements of water through the canyons and surface water circulation driven by seasonal north-west monsoon winds. Detailed seabed mapping in the vicinity of Pillar Bank has shown a correlation between habitats and the biodiversity of various benthic fauna. Areas of high biodiversity and abundance generally correlate with harder substrates where sessile benthos such as sea whips and fans, soft corals, hydroids, crinoids and octocorals—some up to 50 cm in height—have been frequently found. In comparison, soft substrates tend to be associated with low-relief benthos that covers less than 5 % of the surface area (Logan et al. 2006). Water temperatures recorded in parts of the tributary canyons are generally higher (14–16 °C at approximate depths of 230 m) than typical deep-sea environments (usually less than 8 °C) (Wilson 2005). However, despite these warmer temperatures, deepwater fauna such as stalked crinoids, hexactinellid sponges and deepwater pedunculate barnacles are known to occur (Wilson 2005). |
Pressure |
During the development of marine bioregional plans, a regional pressure analysis was conducted to assess present and emerging pressures affecting conservation values in the Marine Regions and the effectiveness of mitigation and management arrangements that are currently in place to address these pressures. The analysis enabled pressures to be categorised in terms of their relative importance or concern and has informed the identification of regional conservation priorities. For the purpose of the plans, pressures are defined broadly as human-driven processes and events that do or can detrimentally affect the region's conservation values. No pressures were assessed as of concern for the Tributary canyons of the Arafura Depression. Pressures assessed as of potential concern are changes in sea temperature and ocean acidification as a result of climate change; physical habitat modification; extraction of living resources and oil pollution. These pressures are described in more detail below. Changes in sea temperature (climate change) Increases in sea temperature is expected to impact on the key ecological features of the North Marine Region, particularly through changes to the distribution, abundance, physiology, morphology and behaviour of zooplankton and pelagic, benthic and demersal fishes (Hobday et al. 2006). Coral reefs and their associated fauna are especially vulnerable to impacts connected to changes in sea temperature through coral bleaching and mortality. Any decreases in coral abundance could lead to changes in ecosystem structure, processes and connectivity between coral reefs and adjacent waters. Nutrients and organic matter sourced from dynamic reef complexes and ontogenetic (lifecycle) movements of fish and crustaceans may be disrupted (Haywood & Kenyon 2009). Epifauna such as sponges, algae and coralline algae may also be impacted by elevated seawater temperatures (Brooke et al. 2009). Ocean acidification (climate change) Ocean acidification is of particular concern for those key ecological features of the North Marine Region that have coral formations. Acidification of corals is likely to alter the distribution and abundance of corals generally (Hobday et al. 2006), and atmospheric CO2 levels above 500 ppm will severely compromise coral viability (Hobday et al. 2006). The acidification of the ocean will impair the ability of species with calcareous shells such as echinoderms, crustaceans and molluscs to maintain shell integrity, resulting in reductions in the abundance and biodiversity of these species (Lawrence et al. 2007). Ocean acidification may also cause changes to the composition of ecological community structures dependent on hard substrate environments, which may in turn impact on food sources for higher trophic-level species. Physical habitat modification (offshore construction) Extraction of living resources (IUU fishing) IUU fishing has the potential to adversely affect widespread populations of multiple species, possibly with long-term, permanent impacts. Illegal foreign fishers have tended to target sharks for the valuable fin market, although the full extent of IUU fishing for shark in northern Australia is largely unquantified. Selected shark stocks targeted by foreign IUU fishers have declined or are overfished (Heupel & McAuley 2007). IUU catch of sharks is estimated to be twice that of reported legal catch (Heupel & McAuley 2007). Oil pollution (oil rigs, onshore and offshore mining operations) The intensity and distribution of activities implicated in oil spills—such as oil production and transport—are likely to increase in the region. |
References
| Brooke, B, Nichol, S, Hughes, M, McArthur, M, Anderson, T, Przeslawski, R, Siwabessy, J, Heyward, A, Battershill, C, Colquhoun, J & Doherty, P (2009). Carnarvon Shelf survey post-cruise report 12 August-15 September 2008. Geoscience Australia, Record 2009/02. | 2009 | |
| Cadman, SJ & Temple, PR (2003). Bonaparte Basin. Australian Petroleum Accumulations Report 5, 2nd edn, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, Geoscience Australia, Canberra. | 2003 | |
| Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2012). Marine bioregional plan for the North Marine Region. Canberra: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. In effect under the EPBC Act from 27 Aug 2012 | 2012 | |
| DRET (Australian Government Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism) (2011). Australia 2011, offshore petroleum exploration acreage release. Regional geology of the Arafura Basin. DRET, Canberra. | 2011 | |
| Earl, K, Logan, G, Struckmeyer, H & Totterdell, J (2006). The northern Arafura Basin-a shallow water frontier. | 2006 | |
| Groote Resources Limited (2010). Groote Resources granted key offshore tenements adjacent to GEMCO's Groote Eylandt deposit. Groote Resources Limited, West Perth. | 2010 | |
| Haywood, MDE & Kenyon, RA (2009). Habitat shifts by decapods-an example of connectivity across tropical coastal ecosystems. Springer, Dordrecht. | 2009 | |
| Heap, A, Daniell, J, Mazen, D, Harris, P, Sbaffi, L, Fellows, M & Passlow, V (2004). Geomorphology and sedimentology of the northern planning area of Australia: review and synthesis of relevant literature in support of regional marine planning. Record 2004/11, Geoscience Australia, Canberra. | 2004 | |
| Heupel, M & McAuley, R (2007). Sharks and rays (chondrichthyans) in the North-west Marine Region. Report to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, WA Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratory, Department of Fisheries, Western Australia, Perth. | 2007 | |
| Hobday, A.J., T.A. Okey, E.S. Poloczanska, T.J. Kunz & A.J. Richardson (2006). Impacts of climate change on Australian Marine Life. Canberra: Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of the Environment and Heritage. | 2006 | |
| Hoegh-Guldberg, O (1999). Coral bleaching, climate change and the future of the world's coral reefs. | 1999 | |
| Howard, WR, Havenhand, J, Parker, L, Raftos, D, Ross, P, Williamson, J & Matear, R (2009). Ocean acidification. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility. | 2009 | |
| Kloser, RJ (2011). Personal Communication. Response to request for information by DSEWPaC on species biodiversity for the tributary canyons as part of the Commonwealth marine environment report card review. | 2011 | |
| Kloser, RJ, Keith, G & Althaus, F (2010). Key ecological features of the east and south-east marine regions: shelf incising canyons. Draft report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra. | 2010 | |
| Lack, M. & G. Sant (2008). Illegal, unreported and unregulated shark catch: A review of current knowledge and action. Canberra, ACT: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and TRAFFIC. | 2008 | |
| Lawrence, M, Ridley, J & Lunty, K (2007). The impacts and management implications of climate change for the Australian Government's protected areas. Discussion paper, Department of the Environment and Water Resources, Canberra. | 2007 | |
| Logan, GA, Ryan, GJ, Glenn, K, Rollet, N, Hemer, M, Twyford, L & Shipboard Party (2006). Shallow gas and benthic habitat mapping, Arafura Sea, RV Southern Surveyor May â June 2005, Post cruise report. Geoscience Australia, Record 2006/19. | 2006 | |
| Lough, JM (2009). Temperature. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility. | 2009 | |
| McClain, CR & Barry, JP (2010). Habitat heterogeneity, disturbance, and productivity work in concert to regulate biodiversity in deep submarine canyons. | 2010 | |
| Vetter, EW (1994). Hotspots of benthic production. | 1994 | |
| Vince, J (2007). Policy responses to IUU fishing in northern Australian waters. | 2007 | |
| Vinogradova, NG (1959). The zoogeographical distribution of the deep-water bottom fauna in the abyssal zone of the ocean. | 1959 | |
| Whiting, S, Long, JL & Coyne, M (2007). Migratory routes and foraging behaviour of olive ridley turtles Lepidochelys olivacea in northern Australia. | 2007 | |
| Wilson, DF (2005). Arafura Sea biological survey report on RV Southern Surveyor expedition 05/2005. A National Oceans Office, Australian Museum and CSIRO project, Hobart. | 2005 |
Caveat
SPRAT provides statutory information on threatened species and ecological communities, migratory species, marine species, and species and species products subject to international trade and commercial use protected under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the EPBC Act). While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of information linked from external sources, the Commonwealth does not guarantee, and accepts no responsibility for, the accuracy, currency or completeness of this information. The Commonwealth is not liable for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of, or reliance on, information contained in this database. The information is not intended to be a complete source of information on the matters it covers. Individuals and organisations should consider all available information, including information from other sources, when determining whether a referral, permit application or exemption under the EPBC Act may be required.