ID: 39
Canyons on the eastern continental slope
Key Ecological Feature
Legal documents
Maps and Images
Profile
Legal description |
The Commonwealth marine area is a matter of national environmental significance under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). As such, actions that have, will have, or are likely to have, a significant impact on it require approval. In February 2014, the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) became the sole designated assessor of petroleum and greenhouse gas activities in Commonwealth waters in accordance with the Minister for the Environment’s endorsement of NOPSEMA’s environmental authorisation process under Part 10, section 146 of the EPBC Act. Under the streamlined arrangements, impacts on the Commonwealth marine area by petroleum and greenhouse gas activities will be assessed solely through NOPSEMA. Key ecological features (KEFs) are not matters of national environmental significance and have no legal status in their own right. However, they may be considered as components of the Commonwealth marine area. This KEF was identified in the Temperate East Marine Bioregional Plan. Under section 176 of the EPBC Act, once a bioregional plan has been made the minister responsible for the environment must have regard to it when making any decision under the Act to which the plan is relevant. |
Values |
Canyon systems have a marked influence on diversity and abundance of species through their combined effects of topography, geology and localised currents, all of which act to funnel nutrients and sediments into the canyon (Kloser & Keith 2010). As such, these features are valued for their enhanced productivity and biological diversity properties. Canyons contribute to habitat diversity by providing a hard surface that offers anchoring points and vertical relief for filter feeder benthic species (Bax & Williams 2001). Hard substrata support different species assemblages; particularly favouring large filter feeder–dominated benthic species (e.g. attached sponges and crinoids) that thrive in abundance in the enhanced current flow conditions (Brewer et al. 2007). Large benthic animals such as sponges and feather stars are abundant, with particularly high diversity found in the upper slope regions (150–700 m) (Kloser & Keith 2010). A range of higher trophic level species, including crustaceans, echinoderms, bivalves, cephalopods and fish are then attracted to these regions. Canyons are therefore significant contributors to overall biodiversity, particularly in terms of benthic organisms. Due to isolation, restricted dispersal and connectivity, it is also expected this diversity encompasses a high degree of endemism, further contributing to the social and biological values of these communities (Brewer et al. 2007; Stocks & Boehlert 2003). |
National and/or regional importance |
The canyons on the eastern continental slope provide habitat (through changes in topography and productivity) that supports a diverse range of benthic, demersal and pelagic species. The Canyons on the eastern continental slope are defined as a key ecological feature as they are a unique seafloor feature with enhanced ecological functioning and integrity, and biodiversity, which apply to both its benthic and pelagic habitats. |
Location |
Submarine canyons are widespread features around the Australian continent and island margins (Heap & Harris 2008, in Kloser & Keith 2010) and the eastern continental slope features a large number of canyons (Brewer et al. 2007). The spatial boundary of this KEF, as defined on the Conservation Values Atlas, is a combination of partial datasets - shelf incising canyon head perimeters (CSIRO 2010) and Geomorphic features of the EEZ (Geoscience Australia 2004). |
Description |
Canyons also affect the water column, interrupting the flow of water across the sea floor and creating turbulent conditions in the water column. This turbulence transports bottom waters to the surface, creating localised upwellings of cold, nutrient-rich waters, which result in regions of enhanced biological productivity relative to surroundings waters (Prince 2001). The enhanced food availability acts to aggregate higher trophic level species, from pelagic tunicates and coelenterates to apex species such as tuna and seabirds, creating regions of high biodiversity (Brewer et al. 2007). During winter, a decrease in water temperature can change water-mass densities, creating regions of downwelling. Although generally associated with low nutrient regimes, in this context these events are thought to play an important role in breaking down shelf-edge fronts, displacing deeper oceanic slope water and consequently pushing relatively nutrient-rich water towards the photic zone (Prince 2001). |
Pressure |
During the development of marine bioregional plans, a regional pressure analysis was conducted to assess present and emerging pressures affecting conservation values in the Marine Regions and the effectiveness of mitigation and management arrangements that are currently in place to address these pressures. The analysis enabled pressures to be categorised in terms of their relative importance or concern and has informed the identification of regional conservation priorities. For the purpose of the plans, pressures are defined broadly as human-driven processes and events that do or can detrimentally affect the region's conservation values. No pressures were assessed as of concern for the Canyons on the eastern continental slope. Pressures assessed as of potential concern are changes in sea temperature and change in oceanography as a result of climate change; chemical pollution; marine debris; physical habitat modification; extraction of living resources; bycatch; and oil pollution. These pressures are described in more detail below. Changes in sea temperature (climate change) Changes in oceanography (climate change) Chemical pollution Marine debris Physical habitat modification (fishing gear) Extraction of living resources (commercial fishing) Bycatch (commercial fishing—domestic) Oil Pollution Australia has a strong system for regulating industry activity that is the potential source of oil spills and this system has been strengthened further in response to the Montara oil spill. While oil spills are unpredictable events and their likelihood is low based on past experience, their consequences, especially for threatened species at important areas can be severe. The level of impact that actually occurs depends on a number of factors including the concentration of oil; chemical and physical properties of the oil (or oil and dispersant mixture). Also influencing the impact of an oil spill event are the timing of breeding cycles and seasonal migrations of species, the amount of contact, the susceptibility of particular species; and the health, age and reproductive status of the individuals (AMSA 2011). Both the intensity and distribution of activities that might lead to oil spills, such as transport, are expected to increase in the region. |
References
| Althaus, F, Williams, A, Schlacher, TA, Kloser, RJ, Green, MA, Bax, NJ, Brodie, P & Schlacher-Hoenlinger, MA (2009). Impacts of bottom trawling on deep-coral ecosystem of seamounts are long lasting. | 2009 | |
| AMSA (Australian Maritime Safety Authority) (2011). National marine oil spill contingency plan. AMSA, Canberra. | 2011 | |
| Baum, JK & Worm, B (2009). Cascading top-down effects of changing oceanic predator abundances. | 2009 | |
| Bax, N & Williams, A (2001). Seabed habitat on the south-eastern Australian continental shelf: context, vulnerability and monitoring. | 2001 | |
| Bensley, N, Stobutzki, I, Woodhams, J & Mooney, C (2010). Review of wildlife bycatch management in Commonwealth fisheries. Bureau of Rural Sciences report prepared for the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Fisheries Policy Branch, Canberra. | 2010 | |
| Brewer, DT, Flynn, A, Skewes, TD, Corfield, J, Pearson, B, Alowa, J & Young, JW (2007). Ecosystems of the East Marine Planning Region. Report to the Australian Government Department of Environment and Water Resources, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Cleveland. | 2007 | |
| Ceccarelli, D & Ayling, T (2010). Role, importance and vulnerability of top predators on the Great Barrier Reef-a review. Research publication no. 105, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville. | 2010 | |
| Chin, A, Kyne, PM, Walker, TI & McAuley, RB (2006). An integrated risk assessment for climate change: analysing the vulnerability of sharks and rays on Australiaâs Great Barrier Reef. | 2006 | |
| Dambacher, JM, Hosack, GR & Rochester, W (2011). Ecological indicators for the exclusive economic zone of Australia's East Marine Region. Report for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. | 2011 | |
| Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2012). Marine bioregional plan for the Temperate East Marine Region. Canberra: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. In effect under the EPBC Act from 27 Aug 2012 | 2012 | |
| Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (2009). NON-CURRENT Threat abatement plan for the impacts of marine debris on vertebrate marine life. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. In effect under the EPBC Act from 1 Jul 2009 | 2009 | |
| Furlani, D, Dowdney, J, Bulman, C, Sporcic, M & Fuller, M (2007). Ecological risk assessment for effects of fishing. Report for the demersal trawl sub-fishery of the coral sea fishery, Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra. | 2007 | |
| GBRMPA (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority) (2009). Great Barrier Reef outlook report. GBRMPA, Townsville. | 2009 | |
| Heap, AD & Harris PT (2008). Geomorphology of the Australian margin and adjacent seafloor. | 2008 | |
| Hobday, A.J., T.A. Okey, E.S. Poloczanska, T.J. Kunz & A.J. Richardson (2006). Impacts of climate change on Australian Marine Life. Canberra: Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of the Environment and Heritage. | 2006 | |
| Hoegh-Guldberg, O & Bruno, J (2010). The impact of climate change on the world's marine ecosystems. | 2010 | |
| Katsanevakis, S (2008). Marine debris, a growing problem: sources, distribution, composition and Impacts. Nova Science Publishers, New York. | 2008 | |
| Kloser, RJ & Keith, G (2010). Key ecological features of the East and South-east Marine regions: âdeep-reefsâ within 150-700 m depths. Report to the Australian Government Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra. | 2010 | |
| Lough, JM (2009). Temperature. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility. | 2009 | |
| Phillips, K, Giannini, F, Lawrence, E & Bensley, N (2010). Cumulative assessment of the catch of non-target species in Commonwealth fisheries: a scoping study. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. | 2010 | |
| Prince, J (2001). Ecosystems of the South East Fishery (Australia), and fisher lore. | 2001 | |
| Ridgway, KR & Hill, K (2009). The East Australian Current. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility. | 2009 | |
| Stocks, K & Boehlert, G (2003). Seamounts and submarine canyons. report from a Census of Marine Life KUU Workshop, 22-24 August, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Newport, Oregon. | 2003 | |
| UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2005). Marine litter, an analytical overview. UNEP, Nairobi. | 2005 | |
| Williams, A, Schlacher, T, Rowden, A, Althaus, F, Clark, M, Bowden, D, Stewart , R, Bax, N, Consalvey, M & Kloser, R (2010). Seamount megabenthic assemblages fail to recover from trawling impacts. | 2010 |
Caveat
SPRAT provides statutory information on threatened species and ecological communities, migratory species, marine species, and species and species products subject to international trade and commercial use protected under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the EPBC Act). While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of information linked from external sources, the Commonwealth does not guarantee, and accepts no responsibility for, the accuracy, currency or completeness of this information. The Commonwealth is not liable for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of, or reliance on, information contained in this database. The information is not intended to be a complete source of information on the matters it covers. Individuals and organisations should consider all available information, including information from other sources, when determining whether a referral, permit application or exemption under the EPBC Act may be required.